How does Jesus Appear to Us? Can We See God Face to Face?

Last month a Swedenborg reader named Nevada Sample submitted a spiritual conundrum about how Jesus appears to human beings and to angels. Here is a shortened version of what he wrote, focusing on his questions:

I have just read your blog “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” Am I still confused? Yes.

In the gospels, between the resurrection and the ascension, the Lord appeared many times to his disciples and others. Sometimes he was recognized. Other times he was not. In what form was he during these appearances?

Even though the Lord is “human,” what difference does it make since no one is ever allowed to see him as a human, rather only manifesting thru some angel, or manifesting as the heavenly sun?

Is Jesus only seen as the sun in heaven OR when he fills an angel with his beingness?

Nevada Sample also asked about Emanuel Swedenborg’s experience of seeing the Lord.

These are highly philosophical and theological questions—questions that push the envelope of what we can know about the nature of God and about how finite human beings can have a relationship with the infinite God. But they also have a personal side that goes to the heart of Christianity and to the meaning and presence of Jesus Christ. My responses to these questions draw on the Bible, on the teachings of Swedenborg, and on my own thoughts based on what I have read and contemplated.

First, here’s the short version:

  1. God is eternally present as the sun of heaven to those whose eyes are open to see it.
  2. Before God came as Jesus Christ, God appeared to humans by filling an angel with the divine presence.
  3. After God came as Jesus Christ, God can and does appear personally both to people and to angels.

Now let’s “look under the hood” and see how all of this works.

For more on how God appears to us, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All About God, The Bible Re-Viewed

How to Know if Mr. or Ms. Right is Right for You: Pointers from Gloria and Emilio Estefan

Gloria and Emilio Estefan (Photo credit: Jesus Carrero)

Gloria and Emilio Estefan

You’ve been in a relationship and are considering taking the next step into marriage with your partner. How can you have confidence that your marriage will not become a statistic like so many others that started with wonderful excitement, promise, and love?

There are many different ideas about what’s necessary for a harmonious long-term marriage:

  • If the sex is great and we are physically attracted to each other, everything else will work itself out.
  • According to the old adage, “opposites attract.” Our opposite natures will keep things interesting!
  • The opposite theory is, “like attracts like.” We’re meant to be together because we enjoy the same diet, the same music, the same movies, the same hobbies, the same vices, and so on.
  • Financial security is key. Does my partner have good money and a reliable job?

All of these things can be helpful in creating and maintaining a good relationship. They’re important—though you may want to go easy on those vices! Still, they are not the key to ensuring a long-term, harmonious marriage.

What does make a marriage stick?

Gloria and Emilio Estefan, the Latin and pop music superstars, have been married for thirty-five years now, and they are still very much in love. What’s their secret? What pointers can we glean from their harmonious, long-term marriage?

For Gloria and Emilio Estefan’s take on making marriage stick, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Popular Culture, Sex Marriage Relationships

The Heavenly City: A Spiritual Guidebook, by Emanuel Swedenborg

The Heavenly City is Swedenborg’s own brief introduction to his religious ideas, translated into readable modern English. If you want to get the basics on Swedenborg in his own words, without having to struggle through old-fashioned translations, this is the book for you!

The Heavenly City
By Emanuel Swedenborg
Translated by Lee Woofenden

The Heavenly City was originally published in Latin in 1758. It was previously published in English under the title The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine. This modern translation assumes no previous knowledge of Swedenborg or of the vocabulary traditionally used in translating Swedenborg’s works.

For further description and review, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Books and Literature

Wrestling with Angels: When “Good Enough” is Not Good Enough

Huh? Wrestling with angels?

Aren’t angels supposed to be the good guys? Don’t they go around spreading love and light and all that wonderful stuff?

Yes, angels are beings of love and light. But as portrayed in the Bible, angels have a dark side, too:

Jacob Wrestling with the Angel, by Eugene Delacroix

Jacob Wrestling with the Angel, by Eugene Delacroix

That same night . . . Jacob was left alone; and a man wrestled with him until daybreak. When the man saw that he did not prevail against Jacob, he struck him on the hip socket; and Jacob’s hip was put out of joint as he wrestled with him. Then the man said, “Let me go, for the day is breaking.”

But Jacob said, “I will not let you go unless you bless me.”

So he said to him, “What is your name?”

And he said, “Jacob.”

Then he said, “You shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with humans, and have prevailed.”

Then Jacob asked him, “Please tell me your name.”

But he said, “Why is it that you ask my name?” And there he blessed him.

So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, “For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life was preserved.” The sun rose upon him as he passed Penuel, limping because of his hip. (Genesis 32:22, 24–31)

Yes, Jacob thought he was wrestling with God. But that’s impossible. God is omnipotent. If the “man” that Jacob was wrestling with had really been God, it would have been no contest! That’s why the story has been traditionally identified as “Jacob wrestling with the angel.” As we’ll see in a future post, in the Bible God commonly appears through angels, and angels are sometimes called “gods.”

Now, if all of the leading characters and all of the stories in the Old Testament are symbolic of Jesus Christ (as he himself told us in several places in the Gospels), does this mean that Jesus, too, wrestled with angels?

And if the Bible is telling the story of our own spiritual rebirth as “new creations in Christ” (see 2 Corinthians 5:17), do we, too, wrestle with angels as part of our spiritual journey?

That’s the subject of a spiritual conundrum posed by a reader named Ray Silverman:

Swedenborg says that Jesus was “tempted by the angels.” I’ve been thinking a lot about this and wondering if this is just something that took place within Jesus’ mind at a level we cannot begin to imagine, or something that takes place within our minds as well. If it does take place within us as well, could you give me some practical examples of how we might be “tempted by the angels.” Thanks!

For more on wrestling with angels, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in The Bible Re-Viewed

Antoinette Tuff and the Averted School Shooting: God’s Love in Action

Michael Brandon Hill, who intended to perpetrate a school shooting in Decatur, Georgia

Michael Brandon Hill

Antoinette Tuff, who averted a school shooting in Decatur, GA

Antoinette Tuff

Last week, on Tuesday, August 20, 2013, Michael Brandon Hill, 20, walked into an elementary school armed with an AK-47 assault rifle and 500 rounds of ammunition. The elementary school was the Ronald E. McNair Discovery Learning Academy in Decatur, Georgia.

Hill fired only six shots.

No one died that day. No one was even injured.

Why not?

Because in the front office of the school, that troubled young man met Antoinette Tuff.

And Antoinette Tuff loved him into laying down his weapon and surrendering to the police.

But if you ask her, it was God’s doing.

For more on Antoinette Tuff and God’s love, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Current Events, Spiritual Growth

What about Spiritualism? Is it a Good Idea to Contact Spirits?

A reader named Rod submitted a spiritual conundrum about Swedenborg and spiritualism. We’ll dig into his question in a minute. First, here’s a thumbnail sketch of what Swedenborg says about contacting spirits.

It is perfectly possible for angels and spirits to talk to people on earth. All that’s necessary is for our spiritual ears to be opened up briefly so that we can hear the angels and spirits who are with us all the time. Angels and spirits commonly spoke to people in the Bible. Many people throughout history and right up to the present have felt the presence or heard the voices of spiritual beings, both heavenly and demonic.

God sometimes sends angels to people who are struggling and in need of spiritual encouragement and inspiration. When we are blessed by a visit from these messengers of God, it is a wonderful thing!

However, when we initiate contact with spirits, we lay ourselves open to many dangers. The spiritual beings who are closest to us while we are living here on earth are not angels, but spirits in an intermediate realm. And due to the dynamics of the spiritual world, the spirits we contact will be very much like ourselves; they will usually just confirm what we already believe, even if it’s not true. So we will most likely end out strongly believing things that are actually false.

In short, when it’s God’s idea to send an angel to us, it is a good and helpful thing. But when it’s our idea to contact the “angels” . . . not so much. Spirits are very good at impersonating angels and revered historical figures. We simply don’t know who we’re really getting at the other end of the line.

To fully understand what’s going on when we contact spirits, we’ll need some background on the spiritual world and how it works. So let’s take a look at Rod’s question, and dig deeper into this fascinating subject.

For more on contacting spirits, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in The Afterlife

Hugh Jackman Battles . . . Gossip?

The Wolverine - Hugh Jackman - 2013

The Wolverine – Hugh Jackman

In 2008, People magazine featured Hugh Jackman as the Sexiest Man Alive.

Today, Jackman is hotter than ever in his new movie, The Wolverine.

(Psst: Hugh Jackman is gay!)

What? Hugh Jackman is happily married!

(Psst: It’s a sham marriage! He’s really gay!)

You see what superheroes have to deal with?

But Hugh Jackman is not a superhero. He just plays one in the movies. And the gossip hurts.

For more on Hugh Jackman’s battle against gossip, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Popular Culture

Containers for God

This article is a sequel to the previous one, “Wavicles of Love.”

The infinity symbol

The infinity symbol

If God is infinite, how can there be room for anything else? Wouldn’t everything just be a part of God? If God is infinite and therefore is present everywhere, how can we humans exist and not be God?

Good questions! I’m sorry you asked! Because now we have to bend our brains some more.

But it will lead us to some practical thoughts that can be helpful to us personally. I promise!

First, let’s do some brain-bending. In True Christianity #33, Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772) writes:

Every created thing is finite. The Infinite is in finite objects the way something is present in a vessel that receives it; the Infinite is in people the way something is present in an image of itself. . . . [In creating the universe,] God first made his infinity finite in the form of substances put out from himself. The first sphere that surrounds him consists of those substances. . . . He then completed the remaining spheres even to the farthest one, which consists of inert elements. He increasingly limited the world, then, stage by stage. I lay this out here to appease human reason, which never rests until it knows how something was done.

Gotta love that final sentence!

What Swedenborg is really talking about, in abstract, philosophical terms, is why we human beings exist, and what our life is all about. In essence, we are God-shaped containers. And if we see and understand that we are God-shaped containers, we can come to know that everything we do—even the most menial task—is helping to bring God’s love and wisdom into this world, so that it can flow to the people around us.

That is what gives meaning to this life that sometimes seems so meaningless.

For more on God, the universe, and us, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Science Philosophy and History

Wavicles of Love

There is an ancient theory that the deeper we look into the nature of reality, the simpler it gets. The Greek philosopher Democritus (c. 460 – c. 370 BC) is often given credit for being the originator of the idea that matter consists of atoms, though his teacher and mentor Leucippus should probably receive that honor. Democritus, however, developed the concept of atoms into a well-developed theory of the nature of reality.

Today, physicists speak of subatomic particles. According to the original atomic theory developed by Leucippus and Democritus, however, this would be a contradiction in terms. The very word “atom” comes from a Greek word meaning “indivisible.”

In this ancient atomic theory, if we were to cut an object, such as a piece of wood, in half, and then cut one of the resulting pieces in half, and so on, eventually we would get to something that could no longer be cut. This would be an atom. Atoms were seen as the fundamental, indivisible building blocks of the universe. According to Democritus’s theory:

  • Atoms are indivisible and indestructible.
  • Atoms have always existed, and always will exist.
  • There is an infinite number of atoms.
  • Atoms come in an infinite variety of sizes and shapes.
  • Atoms are always in motion.
  • In between the atoms there is only empty space.

Democritus believed that all things, including subtle phenomena such as light, consisted of these indivisible, indestructible atoms.

However, it didn’t take long for an alternative viewpoint to be proposed. The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BC) proposed the theory that light is composed of waves that travel through the “element” of air. (Aristotle posited four elements: earth, water, air, and fire.)

Fast forward nearly two and a half millennia to today, and we’re still trying to figure out whether the phenomena we see around us in this material world consist of some sort of fundamental particles, or whether reality is more of a wave-like thing. Sometimes it looks like everything is made of waves; other times it looks like everything is made of particles. And in some famous experiments in which a beam of light is passed through two slits, light seems to behave like both waves and particles at the same time.

Twin slit pattern - Computer generated

Twin slit pattern – Computer generated

(Images courtesy of http://www.hotquanta.com/wpd.html)

This has given rise to the idea that reality involves a “wave-particle duality.” Sometimes particles explain things better, other times waves do, and sometimes it’s necessary to put waves and particles together, resulting in the coined term “wavicle.”

In modern physics, our general experience is that as we look deeper and deeper into the nature of reality, instead of getting simpler, things only gets more complex.

What’s going on here?

Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772) offers some insights and theories that may help to put “wavicles” and the other strange phenomena that occur at the borders of physical reality into a more spiritual and universal perspective. Swedenborg began his adult life as a scientist and ended it as a theologian. As he saw it, science and theology are not in conflict, but form a unified whole.

For more on wave-particle duality and spiritual reality, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Science Philosophy and History

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit

Quick! Guess! What was the hot topic for Christian leaders a few centuries after Jesus Christ died?

Naturally, they were having a spirited discussion about the nature of God.

But that doesn’t quite capture what was going on.

In the late 200s and early 300s, the leaders of the Christian Church were locked in a pitched battle about what the (then) fairly new books of the New Testament meant when they talked about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (also called the Holy Ghost).

And wow, were they confused! What they were reading just didn’t make sense to them. So they began coming up with theories, staking out positions, kicking each other out of the church, and telling each other to go to . . . oh, wait, that’s not quite right. They told everyone who didn’t believe what they themselves believed that they would go to hell.

Yes, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit was the hot topic among Christian leaders in the year 325. That’s when the Roman emperor Constantine invited all 1,800 Christian bishops to a council held in a town called Nicaea. Two or three hundred of them actually showed up. In meetings attended by the emperor himself, these bishops came up with the first version of a statement of belief that attempted to define the relationship between Jesus Christ (the Son) and the Father. The statement they drafted is called the Nicene Creed. The vast majority of Christians and Christian churches have accepted it as essential Christian doctrine ever since.

And yet, the Council of Nicaea is precisely where the Christian Church got seriously off track. At least, it is according to Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772).

Why?

Although the Nicene Creed does not actually use the word “Trinity” or the word “Persons” (neither does the Bible, by the way), what it did say about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit set the Christian Church on a course toward the doctrine of the Trinity of Persons. One and a half to two centuries later, the Athanasian Creed, another statement of belief that greatly expanded on the Nicene Creed, did use the terms “Trinity” and “Persons,” making explicit the doctrine that the earlier creed had strongly implied.

And according to Swedenborg, the doctrine of a Trinity of Persons in God led to a quick death for true Christianity by introducing contradiction, confusion, and polytheism into the church.

For more on the Trinity in God, please click here to read on.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All About God
Lee & Annette Woofenden

Lee & Annette Woofenden

Donate

Support the work of Spiritual Insights for Everyday Life by making a monthly donation at our Patreon

Join 1,271 other subscribers
Earlier Posts
Featured Book

Great Truths on Great Subjects

By Jonathan Bayley

(Click the title link to review or purchase. This website receives commissions from purchases made via its links to Amazon.)

Blog Stats
  • 4,246,552 hits