Lee Woofenden is an ordained minister, writer, editor, translator, and teacher. He is the author of Death and Rebirth: From Near-Death Experiences to Eternal Life and translator of The Heavenly City: A Spiritual Guidebook, by Emanuel Swedenborg, from Latin into contemporary English. He served for ten years as pastor of the New Jerusalem Church in Bridgewater, Massachusetts. He is currently engaged in scholarly work as Annotations Editor and Writer for the New Century Edition of the works of Emanuel Swedenborg, now in publication by the Swedenborg Foundation. He is also a popular online teacher on spiritual subjects. Lee enjoys taking spiritual insights from the Bible and the writings of Emanuel Swedenborg and putting them into plain English as guides for everyday life.
Annette Woofenden is an avid reader and observer of life. She provides many of the story ideas and much of the research behind the posts and articles here on the Spiritual Insights for Everyday Life website.
Spiritual Insights for Everyday Life 
Thank you for “like”-ing my blog posts. I do believe you are the first person to read all the way back to the beginning at this late stage. Thank you.
Hi Lee & Annette I m glad u stopped at my blog.
Thanks for visiting my blog, be in touch with my blog browse through the categories, u may find it interesting
Will our pets live with us in the afterlife ?
Hi Alilah,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your comment and question. From my perspective, the question of pets in the afterlife is a bad news / good news situation. It’s all explained in this post:
Will We See our Pets Again in Heaven?
I hope you find it helpful, whether or not you can entirely agree with it. We each must make up our own mind what we will believe on different issues. Then, when we die, we’ll find out for sure.
Meanwhile, Godspeed on your spiritual journey.
Maybe. God created animals for our pleasure and use. He knows what we love. A kind and loving God just might honor us by letting our favorite pet join us in heaven. I hope to see my border collie Belle some day. But more importantly we will be with Jesus in heaven —if he is our Savior and Lord. That relationship will exceed all, and things of this earth may become way less important.
Hi Lee and Annette thank you for your interest in my blog. Do you know Carla Fredricks my former pastor and friend? I’ve been reading ES for several years now he has helped me understand many things. Blessing to you,
David
Hi David,
Thanks for stopping by. Yes, I know Rev. Friedrich. She is doing some very good work. Glad to hear Swedenborg is helping you to understand this often confusing life of ours!
Hello. Nice meeting you both. I was a Classics minor at Univ of PA. So you disagree with Ken Ham? He’s written for the magazine that’s putting out my article on achievement in a month:
http://aholisticjourney.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/worship-hymn-of-a-tiger-mother-thoughts-on-achievement-culture-faith/
For all your knowledge, I thoroughly appreciate your rejoinder that belief will follow LOVE. How we need this in the Church universal.
Blessings.
Diana
Hi Diana,
Thanks for stopping by. I presume you are referring to my most recent (as I write this) post:
Creation vs. Evolution: Can We All Just Calm Down, Please?
Given that Ken Ham is a young Earth creationist, and reads the Bible very literally, I’d say that yes, I disagree with him. Here are two articles that lay out some of my beliefs about the Bible and about Creation:
Can We Really Believe the Bible? Some Thoughts for Those who Wish they Could
How did God Create the Universe? Was the World Really Created in Six Days?
Warning: The first article may stretch your brain, and the second article will definitely exercise it! 😉
Thanks so much for visiting and liking my blog!
Hi samhitarhodes,
You’re very welcome. Thanks for stopping by.
Hi Lee,
Thank you for following my blog and reading a few of my posts. Hope you liked what you read.
Stay connected!
Much warmth and love,
Deepa
Thanks for stopping by, Baldeep. I enjoyed the posts I read, and look forward to your future posts.
Hi Lee,
Thanks for having a browse through my blog and liking many posts. I look forward to reading yours! Greetings from a festive Dublin 🙂
Hi ldejong4,
You’re welcome! And thanks for stopping by here at Spiritual Insights for Everyday Life!
Thanks for liking the quotes I posted, and for the insight you’ve put in your site for us!
My pleasure. Thanks for stopping by!
Thank you for reading my two recent blog entries on Billy Fingers and Swedenborg. I will look for your book “The Heavenly City”.
Hi charlessides,
You’re welcome, and thanks for stopping by.
For more about The Heavenly City, and links to buy a new or used copy or read it free online, go to this blog post:
The Heavenly City: A Spiritual Guidebook, by Emanuel Swedenborg
Enjoy!
Thank you kindly for dropping by my blog and leaving a response. 🙂
You’re welcome. Thanks for stopping by!
Lee, This is David Adams at Emerge. We’d love to hear from you and have a question. Please call me or Susan at Emerge, and leave contact information. Great blog, by the way!
Hi David,
Good to hear from you, and great to talk to you this morning. It’s been a long time!
For those reading in, David is one of the key figures at Emerge, a leading domestic violence counseling and education center in the Boston area where I did an internship during my seminary training in the 1990s.
Hello and thank you for stopping by my blog and “liking” today’s very simple post. I hope you’ll return often and find something useful in your Christian walk. I’ve perused your blog and find myself needing to return to read more. Thanks for the works you are doing.
Hi Sherrey,
You’re welcome. Thanks for stopping by!
Hello Mr. Woofenden,
Just wanted to thank you for commenting on our article on http://www.everwideningcircles.com “EWC is 6 Months Old!”, it was nice to hear your encouragement (in such a hilarious way no less!). Feel free to reblog anything you think fits your blog, my friend.
All the best!
Hi Christopher,
You’re welcome! I’d forgotten all about that one. 😉
And thanks for stopping by.
Thank you Lee and Annette for your blog. It helps me understand alot of things that once troubled me! You make it very simple to understand. I’ve also gained alot of interest on Emanuel Swedenborg. Thank you!
Hi Mummy’s girl,
You’re very welcome! We are glad to know that our articles here are giving you greater understanding to help you face your struggles in life. We wish you blessings and strength on your journey forward. If you have any further questions as you read, please don’t hesitate to ask.
Hello, Lee,
I’ve seen your name in other discussions. I don’t know how to contact you aside from this comment. I wanted to thank you for the careful critique on Christian Stack Exchange about Luther’s efforts to translate Greek and Latin in his fides solus ideas from Rom 3:28. I’ve been researching differences between Augustine, Luther, Calvin and Wesley, in contrast to Swedenborg’s critique of post Nicean Council Christianity, and Wesley’s angry attack.
I recently retired from teaching philosophy, and have been trying to write.
Yours, Justin Synnestvedt, Chicago
Hi Justin,
Thanks for stopping by. Glad you found the material over at Christianity.SE helpful. I’ve been engaging in quite a bit of doctrinal debate there, as well as answering a number of questions from the perspective of Swedenborg’s theology, not to mention asking a few questions of my own.
Good luck on your writing!
Hello Lee,
Well… I don’t know exactly where to begin, because I find myself a bit overwhelmed. I’ve only just recently discovered your website/blog, which I’ve spent the better portion of a day or so racing through reading as many postings and replies as possible, and now I’m trying to find the best way to describe my overall impression. Here’s an awkward, yet not too far off-base analogy…
My wife has a friend who was adopted from birth, who recently had the experience of using the Internet to discover a long-lost sibling whom she never previously knew existed. When at last, she met up with her sibling for the first time, she was amazed to discover… in this complete stranger… an individual who shared many of her same thought processes, preferences, views, beliefs and philosophical perspectives; indeed, more so than with anyone else she’d ever known, including those in her own adoptive family. By the end of her first conversation with her newfound sibling, the she was finding herself completing her sibling’s sentences, and she hers, as if they shared many of the same thoughts.
So, not to sound overly dramatic, but that’s rather what it has felt like for me to read through your blog site.
You see, I’ve been on a highly challenging, research-intensive, spiritual quest/mission now for the better part of fifteen years; one to explore and develop a framework for interfaith worship, peaceful coexistence and symphonic cooperation. It is a quest which to my dismay, has thus far been a largely, solitary journey… which has never been my intent nor expectation.
When I first began my quest, I set about eagerly trying to connect with like-minded others, to share my thoughts and revelations, bounce ideas and proposals, get further inspired, pool resources, etc. Of course, I have run into some relatively like-minded folks along the way, including even a few like-minded organizations… albeit a very small number. Some of these included folks in local and online religious denominations, non-profit advocacy organizations, user-groups, blogs, etc.
However, I’ve not really ever found a person, site, organization, or denomination whose writings and discussions even come close to “hitting the bullseye” insofar as the angle that I’ve been developing is concerned. For example, I was disappointed to discover that the majority of discussion that takes place within most “interfaith initiative” and “inter-religious dialogue” groups is usually folks trying make apologetics-style arguments for the “truth and rightness” of their religion over all others. And when I’ve visited some of the more open-minded, widely inclusive denominations to better understand their approach to interfaith worship, I also found myself. While I greatly admired their broad inclusivity, they often seem to achieve this via a BYOT (bring your own theology) approach that I find sorely lacking in spiritual depth and/or guiding theological doctrine. Since I, like the vast majority of followers, come to places of worship in the hopes of finding spirituality and guidance, this approach struck me as less than ideal.
So this brings me to your blog.
I have to say that thus far, I’ve never run across a collection of writings which resonate so powerfully, and which do such an astounding job of articulating so many of the ideas, concepts and perspectives that I’ve been striving to articulate myself for this initiative, for more than a decade and a half.
Of course, I realize it is not necessarily your (stated) interest or intention to neither promote interfaith dialogue nor possibly even (heaven forbid, we consider it…) worship. However, regardless of intent, your collective writings provide some of the most eloquent arguments I’ve yet read for cutting through the ignorance and single-mindedness that pervades much of the world’s religious systems. If we are to develop guiding documents to teach and define ways to diffuse the toxic tensions and break down the largely arbitrary barriers between people with varying perspectives on worship, they must be crafted with the kind of deft language which you’ve used in your blog.
So I must extend sincere Kudos to you sir, for great works!
I very much look forward to following your blog and getting to know your works further.
Most sincerely
Christopher Daniel King
Hi Christopher,
It’s good to hear from you, and hear your story. I’m glad our blog has struck a chord with you! Of course, it’s early yet, and you’ll probably need some time to mull it all over. But I will say that this is not the first time I’ve had people discover this perspective and these beliefs, and expressed it as finally finding people who believe what they have believed all along, but thought no one else did. For an increasing (I think) number of people who have searched and finally found it, Swedenborg’s theology (especially in its more contemporary expressions) is the spiritual home base they’ve been looking for.
During the decade I was a pastor I was very much involved in ecumenical and interfaith activities in the town where my church was located. And it seems I was very blessed to be among a group of pastors and chaplains who really weren’t there to push the superiority of their own beliefs, but truly wanted to work together with people of varying faiths and perspectives to accomplish good in the community. So I do have some previous experience of how that can work, even if on a rather small scale. In fact, during that decade I was one of the leaders of our local ecumenical and interfaith council, and brought together, if only briefly, pastors and churches that didn’t usually talk to one another.
Having said that, you’re right to sense that interfaith dialog and common worship is not one of my primary interests now. I am more focused on reaching out with the theology and perspective I love to people who will be helped by it, and for whom it will resonate. So while I’m supportive of greater connections among churches and religions, I’m not actively involved in efforts toward that worthy goal at this time.
Annette and I very much enjoyed reading your comment. Knowing that we’re reaching people who find these articles and the spiritual viewpoint behind them helpful is what keeps us going. So thank you for your kind words. And if you have any questions or there is anything you’d like to discuss as you read the various articles here, please feel free to comment at will.
Lee,
Thanks so very much for your thoughtful reply!
I was certainly gladdened that both you and Annette enjoyed my comment, as the work you both are doing is certainly deserving of high praise.
Of course, I certainly understand your desire to stay focused on teaching Emmanuel Swedenborg, as that is clearly your calling. Moreover, I can definitely understand why you feel he deserves such focus. I was previously unfamiliar with Swedenborg, and your blog has definitely been my introduction to him. I certainly plan to explore his works and theology more deeply. I am particularly intrigued by your indication that he delved into near-death experience, or something akin to it, as a window into the afterlife. NDEs is a topic about which I’ve had a longstanding curiosity, for that very same reason. They are a phenomena that I look upon now with even greater fascination, having recently experienced three or more NDEs myself whilst undergoing a major medical crisis a few years ago.
Indeed, I think its partly because of those experiences, that for me, the interfaith initiative about which I wrote earlier continues to be calling of my own. I feel compelled, now more than ever, to strive to establish a framework of conflict-resolving rationales, mutually agreeable principles and common-ground beliefs to which multiple faiths might be open to subscribing; one that might potentially serve as a foundation for offsetting the rising tide of hostile, religious extremism around the world (wildly quixotic as that goal may sound). And as it happens, a number of your blog essays and arguments, all of which are so spectacularly well-crafted, are surprisingly well-aligned to my initiative’s goals. So I hope you won’t mind if I continue to go on being inspired by your works :-).
Thanks again!!
Chris
Hi lee
I would say for some people sites like this make them say oh it was meant to be taken in spiritual terms because when anyone is young the ones that teach tend to say stuff from religious texts as if they were literal, I for one am glad that people can finally not fear the texts when ever someone tries to teach the bible. 🙂
Hi Tony,
Thanks for your thoughts. Yes, as people grow spiritually, the hope is that they will move from a simple, literal understanding of the text to a deeper and more spiritual one.
Thank You. You have put into words what my “gut” has felt all along.
Hi Andrew,
You’re very welcome! Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad the articles here are confirming what you already felt to be true. If you have any thoughts or questions as you read, please feel free to leave a comment.
Hello Lee,
Thank you for your teachings and I visited it today and I was stayed all the day reading and rethinking some of the things I was believing. Please may you email me with this email address [email address removed] so that I may ask you some of the questions you created in my mind?
Hi zemenblog,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your comment. I’m glad the blog is providing you with much food for thought!
I do try to limit the amount of individual email I send and receive simply for time’s sake. But you would be very welcome to ask your questions in comments on some of the articles here. That way our conversations would be of benefit to other readers as well. You are also welcome to submit a Spiritual Conundrum it’s not a question that would work well in a comment.
May God bless your family and your ministry!
Very glad to have found you both, altho, as I just commented elsewhere, I just don’t think you spell your last name quite right, in light of my Wolfenden relatives! 🙂 JK!
I just ordered Divine Providence, and am very thankful for your ministry, and for the community that has formed here! I believe I will receive answers and more needed freedom from visiting here, and that in turn will prepare me better for my purpose in the Body of Christ and on this earth.
Again, thanks and God bless you!!
Hi Ann,
Nice to have you here, and thanks for your delightful comment!
As family lore has it, our name was once Wolfenden, or perhaps Woolfenden, but was changed somewhere along the way generations ago when the male family lineage still resided in England. My father’s mother was a Yeomans fresh out of England, where his father was stationed during WWI. Yes, she was a war bride! 😉 My father visited her relatives in England several times when he was still alive on this earth. You may also be tickled to know that my best friend in elementary school was named Jim Wolfington, which caused no end of confusion and mis-delivered mail!
I’m glad you’re enjoying the articles here, and do hope you’ll find them helpful in your walk with Christ. If you have any questions along the way, please don’t hesitate to ask.
Hi, Mr. Woofenden!
I’m very, very glad I found your blog today, as it’s been a hard day. Your posts about the afterlife and hell have given me a lot of comfort. I am a Byzantine Catholic, but even being from a perspective outside of Catholicism, your posts still resonate with me and have helped me stop crying for the time being. Thank you for your wonderful insights. Much love to you and your wife.
Hi young catholic,
Thanks so much for stopping by, and for your good and kind words. I’m glad our articles here have given you some solace and comfort! Annette and I wish you fewer tears and increased strength as you face your pain and your struggles and move forward on your spiritual journey.
Lee
I am grateful that i was guided to your blog today while searching for an increased understanding of my Faith journey.
Mike
Hi Mike,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your comment. Annette and I wish you godspeed on your spiritual journey!
Mr Lee, you need to revisit your conclusion about “works”. A saved believer’s works are not the cause of salvation, they evidence of it. Humans have absolutely zero participation in their spiritual birth the same exact way humans have zero participation in their natural birth. Salvation is wholly the work of God, including the decision of who is saved. Any other consideration or conclusion removes God from being in control and give it to man. A very bad idea indeed.
Hi jo316hn,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your comment.
However, what you are saying here consists of half-truths that are contrary to the plain teachings of the entire Bible. The Bible commands us to do many things regarding our salvation, including, at the most basic level, believing in God, repenting from our sins, and obeying God’s commandments. And the Bible explicitly says that we have a choice about whether we will live or die:
If we have zero participation in our spiritual birth, then God is lying to us in this passage when God says that we have a choice between life and death.
And if we don’t have a choice whether or not to let God into our life, but God makes that choice for us as you say, then God is also lying to us in this passage:
You are very much mistaken, my friend, because you have not paid attention to the plain teachings of the Bible. As Jesus said, “You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition” (Mark 7:8)—a tradition passed down to you from Martin Luther and John Calvin, who invented the beliefs that you hold to, ignoring the Bible’s plain teachings. Their false teachings utterly destroy the entire message of the Bible.
However, our About page is not the place to engage in a doctrinal debate. For starters, please read this article:
Faith Alone Does Not Save . . . No Matter How Many Times Protestants Say It Does
And I recommend that you also read the follow-up article:
Faith Alone Is Not Faith
If you want to discuss these issues further, feel free to do so in the comment section of one of these articles. But please read the articles first. I don’t want to have to repeat everything I already wrote there. Meanwhile, I will delete any further responses on this subject that you put here on the About page—which is more for general greetings.
My father passed away a week ago and this blog has brought me so much comfort before I lay my head to rest at night. I’m glad I found it.
Thanks so much fot these incredible writings and glorious truths. 🙏
God bless your work.
Hi educationforkidsbyisaac,
I’m sorry to hear about your father’s death, but glad our blog has brought you some help and comfort. Thank you for your kind words.
Lee and Annette, I came across your site tonight and I was taken away. All the questions that I have have been battling with for so long just sprang from the page at me. I believe in “One” God, but the guilt I felt questioning why “My” religion is right, and not “Theirs”, was consuming me. Thank you, thank you, thank you, for giving a voice to my questions and a confirmation of my beliefs.
Hi Bob,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your comment. I’m glad you’ve found the articles here so helpful to your faith. If you have any questions or further thoughts along the way, please feel free to comment again. Meanwhile, Godspeed on your spiritual journey!
Mr. & Mrs: Was your relation William Ross Woofenden? Thanks for your important work on the New Century Editions. They somewhat left us old timers in the dust with the new terminology but terrific for those of the next generations. I share your desire for easy-to-read text. That is my whole mission in life. When I was born Doctors said I would need to be placed in an institution because of mental retardation. My mother refused. Although agnostic she placed me in a church. I met Jesus at 7. He gave me illumination to learn although not without a struggle. So I want to give the same opportunity to the new adherents to the New Jerusalem of folks from the highways and byways. Thanks for answering the question that I had never really found.
Hi Leslie,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your good thoughts.
William Ross Woofenden was my father. It was his vision for an annotated edition of Swedenborg that is finally bearing fruit with the New Century Edition. As you say, the old-timers often prefer the old language of the Standard Edition of Swedenborg’s works, but new and more contemporary translations are necessary for the upcoming generations of people who are not raised with the old-fashioned language of the older translations.
Am adding a page to uscrash.net titled Science proves God, would like to use some of your stuff and a link back to you?
Hi Fred,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your request.
In response, I mostly avoid politics here in order to reach people of all political persuasions with a spiritual message. For that reason, I prefer not to be linked to particular political stances on other websites, including religious beliefs applying biblical prophecies to political entities such as the United States. My belief is that those prophecies are about spiritual events, not worldly ones. See, for example, “Is the World Coming to an End? What about the Second Coming?”
You are welcome to link to articles here if you think your readers will find them helpful. But I ask you not to reproduce any articles or large segments of articles from here on your website. Thank you.
Hi Lee and Annette. Thanks for visiting my blog and reading a few posts, I do appreciate the annotated edition of Swedenborg, and your work on it. Keep up the good work in good health and prosperity.
Hi lclioncross,
Good to hear from you, and thanks for your kind words. We wish you every blessing on your spiritual journey.
Hi Lee, Jeremy here. We had a conversation a little over a year ago on here. I respect your work greatly, as it aligns with my own thought better than any other I’ve came a cross. Just wondering what you think of the uncertainty in these times with all the civil unrest. Thank you
Hi Jeremy,
Good to hear from you again. Really, there’s been disruption and civil unrest in every century and nearly every decade since time immemorial. Today is no different, except that the social and spiritual changes that are often associated with civil unrest have accelerated in recent times. Change is messy, but entirely necessary if humanity is not to sink into stagnation and degeneration.
However, rather than discussing it here, please give this article a read, and we can continue the conversation in the comments section there if you wish:
The Evangelicals are Right: The World IS Coming to an End!
Came across your articles just after losing my precious husband about six months ago. Thank you so much for your insight. It actually gave me a reason to live after being so heartbroken. All I can say about John Piper who seems to have built a cruel doctrine around no marriage in heaven is that he has never met his soul mate. Neither has he taken five minutes to research that verse. One could never accept that doctrine if they had ever known true love. Incidentally Mr. Piper endorses Olive Tree commentaries, etc. Their blog on that verse gives the literal translation. “Neither marry in heaven” refers to Levirate marriages and “neither are given in marriage” refers to contractual marriages. John 14 refers to God preparing homes in heaven for us and our spouses and families according to literal translations. Lee and Annette, thank you so much. I wept when I read your words that death can not separate what God has joined together. God bless you.
Hi Joy,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your good words. I am sorry to hear about your husband’s death. But also glad that our blog has helped you to find some peace, and hope for your future reunion with your beloved.
Unfortunately, traditional Christian preachers such as John Piper have been steeped in the belief that there is no marriage in heaven based on centuries of their churches misreading Jesus’ words, and based on a generally physical-minded and earthly view of marriage. Though I do not have God’s vision to assess their marriages, like you, I do wonder whether they could possibly say such things if they had experienced real, deep spiritual marriage with their wives (or husbands). Meanwhile, they must come up with arguments as to why their church’s beliefs on this subject are good and true. But those beliefs are just as wrong, cruel, and painful as ever, even if these preachers may be well-intentioned.
About the two words for “marry” and “be given in marriage,” for those reading in, I covered their meaning in the article “Marriage in Heaven: A Response to Tom Wenig,” under the heading “What, exactly, does Jesus say?” As explained there, one word refers to a man getting married, and the other refers to a woman being given to a man in marriage, according to the cultural marriage customs of the day. Though I agree that neither levirate marriages nor contractual marriages exist in heaven (all marriages there are spiritual marriages, which are a union of two minds into one), I don’t see any basis for assigning those meanings to these two Greek words.
Also for those reading in, I deal with John Piper’s views on marriage in heaven in this article: “Marriage in Heaven: A Response to Randy Alcorn and John Piper.”
Once again, I’m glad the articles here have helped you so much. Our thoughts and prayers are with you, and we wish you a good and fruitful 2023. As much as you would rather spend it with your husband, at least you can know that he is still with you in spirit, and that you will rejoin him when your time on this earth is over.
Hi Lee,
I notice it’s been a while since you answered anyone in the blog. Hope everything is alright.
Blessings! 🙂
Hi Caio,
Yes, everything is fine. Thanks for asking. Just haven’t had any spare time to get to the blog. I will catch up on replies sooner or later.
Hi Lee,
Glad to hear that everything is fine. 🤗
Thank you!
I believe that if you are not contemplating scripture for what it actually is, that being the thoughts and visions God was placing in the minds of the prophet authors to inspire them to write as they did, the best you have is “thinking as humans do”.
I believe that the bible, if considered correctly, is a “calling card” to become an “Israelite”. Being an Israelite has little to nothing to do with bloodlines or nationality. An “Israelite” may be as simple as someone that has been enlightened by God (let there be light), pays attention to what God shows them, and attempts to fulfill the tasks given. This is where the “rise of Israel” will begin.
Jesus taught that one must overcome the flesh in order to gain understanding. The following are 6 “rules” to apply to scripture while reading, that may help to achieve this:
1) We are bound by the physical properties of this world. This eliminates miracles of the flesh.
2) The “word” (scripture) is the “water”.
3) Nearly all things scripture discusses are humans or groups of humans. (Revelation 18:12)
4) A “man” in scripture may be male or female. (Genesis 1:27)
5) A “woman” in scripture is “wisdom”.
6) “Jesus” is the “spirit of prophecy”. (Revelation 19:10)
There may be more, but these are what I’m allowed to understand. I’ll give an example of how this works:
If the word is the water, and you consider the stories of character and circumstance as “containers of water”, are these the containers of water to be turned into wine?
If a “woman” in scripture is “wisdom”, and that wisdom is shared by many, such as an organized religion or political party, does that “wisdom” become a “harlot”?
If the word is the water, and “Jesus” is the “spirit of prophecy”, is it possible for one in possession of the spirit of prophecy to “walk” with a higher understanding of scripture? This is “Jesus walking on water”.
Jesus taught how to become a “christ” or one enlightened. I came across your site on a search for religions that follow the teachings of Jesus. I read what was written about christianity. I’ll say what you neglected to say, that being that christianity is the antichrist by not teaching the teachings of Jesus. This may be the “stone” that brings Goliath down.
I’ll exit with a question:
For a God that can do anything, why are the ten commandments written on two stone tablets?
Thank you for reading, and may God bless
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your good thoughts.
Rather than responding in detail and engaging in theological discussion here on this biography page, I’ll refer you to a few articles that take up some (but by no means all) of the points you raise:
Feel free to continue the conversation in the comments section of any of the articles.
Meanwhile, Godspeed on your spiritual journey.
Hi Lee,
Just received an email in your name this morning. Just confirming if it’s really from you! 😄
Blessings!
Hi Caio,
Yes, it’s from me. And we’re not stuck in an airport in a foreign country without any money because someone stole our wallets and credit cards! 😀
Over the past few months, I happened upon a few of your commentaries and agree with what I read, especially your criticism of Christians who believe in doctrines such as the Trinity that are not discussed or mentioned in the bible. But when you mention an evil Satan, and that God, incarnated as Jesus, came to Earth to overcome his evil, etc., my hair stood up on end because there is absolutely no derogatory information regarding that individual to be found except in the New Testament, which I have come to believe stands for No Truth, and the reason I quit being a xtian.
Ha’Satan is an obedient servant of God in the Tanakh who serves as the prosecuting attorney in God’s court, the Divine Council (Psalm 82:1), and is not an adversary of God. Only God creates light, peace, and corruption (Isaiah 45:7). Apart from human beings who resist Him, God has no archrival, nor are there malevolent spiritual forces not under His authority. God is behind the good and the bad, the blessings and the curses. To believe God has an archenemy is blasphemy and wrong! God is also interchangeable with Satan. Compare these parallel passages:
1 Chron 21:1 – And there standeth up an adversary against Israel, and persuadeth David to number Israel (Young’s Literal Translation). Look it up! It’s an honest translation. https://www.biblestudytools.com/ylt/
2 Sam 24:1 – And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
In John 8:44, Jesus refers to Satan as “a murderer from the beginning” to emphasize his role in introducing sin, death, and deception into the world. Who did he murder without God’s OK? No one! So, how and when did the mistranslated word “satan” become the mean old Devil we know in Christendom? Satan and his band of angels are pure concoctions made “out of whole cloth” by the corrupt Christian church. I was raised to believe God kicked Satan out of Heaven sometime before Adam’s fall. However, no such event is recorded in the Old Testament, as it would be if it were true. So I naturally wondered how Satan, rather Ha’satan, could appear and speak to God in the Book of Job if he had been ejected from Heaven. No one can explain that to me. If God has an enemy, it would be humans on this planet who do not seek his kingdom through moral and ethical actions.
The only truth I find in the New Testament is that God is not a god of chaos or confusion (1 Cor 14:33) and would not want to mislead those of us who believe in Him; therefore, if a Divine Son had existed, he would have been mentioned in the OT. There is no need for anyone, especially God, to die for our sins. Psalm 32:3-5 lays out God’s path to forgiveness of sin, which consists of confession and remorse. Human sacrifice is banned by God, so why should we believe he sent HIS son, if he had one, as a sacrifice?
Everything in the New Testament belongs in the cosmic trash bin. Anyone studying the Dark Ages can only conclude that the Roman Catholic Church ran a criminal organization that would make the Mafia look like saints. And shame on Protestantism for following in their evil footsteps.
Hi Richard,
Thanks for stopping by, and for your long comment. I’m glad you found some congenial ideas here.
I understand that you have rejected Christianity, but the “Christianity” that exists today is not even Christian. Not a single one of its key doctrines is stated by Jesus Christ, or anywhere in the Bible. They are all human fabrications made up over the centuries and set in place as cornerstones of the various “Christian” churches in place of Jesus Christ and his teachings. See:
The Christian Church is Not Christian
The “Christianity” that you have rejected is not Christian at all. It is a non-Christian, largely pagan-derived religion, starting with its core belief in three gods, adopted under the watchful eye of the pagan Roman emperor Constantine.
You haven’t rejected Christianity. You’ve rejected a pagan religion posing as Christianity. I reject that religion also. It is not Christian, and it has nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus Christ—which, as you suggest, are all about repentance from sin, not about Jesus making himself into a blood payment to appease God.
About Satan, as you say, the Bible never says that Satan, or the Devil, was an archangel that rebelled against God. There are ancient books that present this scenario, but those books are not in the Bible, and that’s for a reason. Even those extra-biblical stories were never meant to be taken literally, as they are by the so-called Christian Church today. The Bible never even says that angels are separately created beings as traditional Christianity teaches. See:
What is the Biblical Basis for Humans becoming Angels after they Die?
As you suggest, the Devil is indeed humans from this planet in rebellion against God. Those who go on to the spiritual world without repenting form hell—and Satan or the Devil is simply a personification of hell. See:
Is there Really a Devil? Why??
That article goes through the meanings of the Hebrew and Greek words commonly translated “Satan” and “the Devil.” Long story short: there is no individual named “Satan” or “the Devil” who was once an archangel but rebelled against God and is now God’s celestial opponent. Rather, these are simply collective terms for all of human evil, and all evil humans taken together as a body, similar to “the Church,” sometimes personified as the bride of Christ, as the collective body of the faithful.
Another way of saying this is that “Satan” and “the Devil” are simply collective terms personifying hell.
In the book of Job, Satan is used as a character in the unfolding story. The book of Job is clearly a composed narrative, not something intended to report actual historical events. It has all the hallmarks of a literary work and a moral story, and that’s exactly what it is. The original writer of that book did not have a ringside seat at God’s celestial council. He was using that scene as a literary device in telling his story about puny humans’ struggles and triumphs in the face of God’s greatness and omnipotence. Taking the book of Job literally, as if God and some celestial figure named Satan were actually having a little chat about human fates up in the empyrian heights of heaven, is completely missing the point and genre of the story.
About Jesus’ sacrifice, that, as with most things, has been completely misunderstood in Nicene Christianity. In particular, the sacrifices were not “payments” to God, and they were not designed to “satisfy” God in the Catholic sense. Really, they were feasts with God. But that will be the subject for a future two-part article here on the meaning of sacrifice in the Old Testament, and its symbolic meaning in the New Testament.
For now, I will just say that the feast that Jesus had with his disciples just before his crucifixion is a better indication of the meaning of Jesus “sacrifice” than the millions of words written about it in so-called “Christian” sermons and catechisms. Jesus said, referring to his impending crucifixion:
Jesus’ “sacrifice” was not some blood payment to God, and the Bible never says that it was. Rather, it was a way to bridge the gap between God and sinful humans, drawing them to a feast of love and truth with God. But again, that will be the subject of a future two-part article series here.
About who Jesus was and is, please see:
Who is God? Who is Jesus Christ? What about that Holy Spirit?
There is much more I could say, but that’s enough for now. Feel free to continue the conversation, preferably in the comments section of one of the linked articles dealing with these subjects, where it will be more on-topic than here on our introductions page.
Meanwhile Godspeed on your spiritual journey.